Keep in mind, that these are minimum requirements, so you want be happy. I have never installed Win 7 on such bad configuration, but I have done it on virtual machine and it was too bad. I know that this is a matter of personal opinion, but if I am stuck with that computer, I wold try with lubuntu , or some other lightweight linux.
If you are using computer for web browsing and watching videos, there is no reason why you shouldn't give ubuntu a chance. Windows 7 tends to perform okay on limited hardware like that.
I had Windows 7 on those specs and it was okay, but I would try and but some more RAM in if you could. It would be more secure and modern- I would prefer it over XP, but I doubt it would perform better - it would be the same or worse. That said, by today's standards that laptop is gutless and will chug badly browsing the modern web- the CPU just isn't up to it and I'm speaking from experience here.
I would put the money towards a new laptop - even if it's a bottom rung model, it will effortlessly outperform the Atom. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Would Windows 7 run faster than Windows XP on an old notebook?
Ask Question. Asked 6 years, 8 months ago. Active 3 years, 9 months ago. Viewed 9k times. Would it perform better if I flattened it and installed Windows 7?
I am not technical, so an answer with easier words would be appreciated. Improve this question. Adrian Grant Adrian Grant 21 1 1 silver badge 2 2 bronze badges. Not an answer to your question, but I have a machine with similar specs Asus eee pc which runs very smooth on Android-x86 , whereas XP was extremely slow.
Not sure if your hardware is supported of course, but it may be worth having a look. Its going to be slower then a slug period. You have bottom of the barrel hardware with almost minimal memory for applications that exist in Clearly, it isn't going to be faster on the same hardware - it is doing so much more than XP.
Is it faster than Vista? Not especially, but then again - despite what the nay-sayers claim - Vista wasn't that slow anyway; certainly not when running on Vista-generation hardware. I can assure you that if you compared XP on hardware, Vista on hardware, and Windows 7 on hardware that you would pick Windows 7 every time. If you are getting a new machine particularly a higher-end machine like you are proposing , you should be getting Windows 7 and IMHO it should also be x Unless you have a legacy app that says otherwise, there is no good reason to drag your heels when it comes to going bit.
Your new hardware will more than compensate for the extra sophistication of Windows 7 and the extra work that entails. So i got this old pc given to me with 2.
I think it's a nvidia 6 series card with 54mb or something similar. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top.
Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Objective speed comparison of Windows 7 vs. Windows XP Ask Question. Asked 12 years, 1 month ago. Active 11 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 6k times.
Any useful links? Improve this question. Clay Nichols Clay Nichols 1, 6 6 gold badges 24 24 silver badges 30 30 bronze badges. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes. Test Freaks Beta News. Improve this answer. GregD GregD 8, 1 1 gold badge 22 22 silver badges 35 35 bronze badges. Not really, most people using XP would be using the 32 bit version.
Malware exploits are typically restricted to operating within the context of permissions and privileges of the logged-in user. Malware preys on the fact that so many users log in to Windows as administrators, giving the exploit virtually omnipotent access to the Windows PC. UAC ensures that users run with standard privileges most of the time, and that elevating privileges requires a conscious action, preventing malware from successfully exploiting the system. The web is a common attack vector for malicious exploits, and PMIE restricts the privileges of Internet Explorer to reduce the ability of an attack to modify the Windows system, alter or destroy data, or install malicious code on the PC.
Admittedly, none of these security controls is infallible. While those are all valid issues, the fact remains that Windows 7 is more secure.
If both Windows XP and Windows 7 are affected by the same vulnerability, but the additional security controls contain the threat to a moderate level on Windows 7 while critical on Windows XP, it seems that Microsoft is headed in the right direction. Windows XP is a very capable operating system. There is no denying that.
However, Microsoft has added a variety of features and functions that let users work more efficiently and effectively, and the additional security features in Windows 7 make it much less likely that the OS will be crippled by an attack. MENU Log in. Trending Now. Home » Security.
0コメント